Abstractly Interpreting Argumentation Frameworks for Sharpening Extensions
نویسندگان
چکیده
ly Interpreting Argumentation Frameworks for Sharpening Extensions Ryuta Arisaka and Jérémie Dauphin [email protected], [email protected]
منابع مشابه
On the Existence of Semi-Stable Extensions
In this paper, we describe an open problem in abstract argumentation theory: the precise conditions under which semi-stable extensions exist. Although each finite argumentation framework can be shown to have at least one semi-stable extension, this is no longer the case when infinite argumentation frameworks are considered. This puts semi-stable semantics between stable and preferred semantics....
متن کاملSelecting Extensions in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
Recently, Dunne et al. [9,10] introduced the concept of WAF (Weighted Argumentation Framework). Such frameworks extend standard Dung’s ones for abstract argumentation by associating weights with attacks. In the WAF setting, weights are used for relaxing extensions, which proves useful when there are too few extensions. In this paper, we exploit weights in a different perspective. We show how to...
متن کاملPerfection in Abstract Argumentation1
It is a well-known fact that stable semantics might not provide any extensions for some given abstract argumentation framework. Arguably such frameworks might be considered futile, at least with respect to stable semantics. We propagate σ -perfection stating that for a given argumentation graph all induced subgraphs provide σ -extensions. We discuss perfection and conditions for popular abstrac...
متن کاملThe Matrix Approach for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Matrices and the operation of dual interchange are introduced into the study of Dung’s argumentation frameworks. It is showed that every argumentation framework can be represented by a matrix, and the basic extensions (such as admissible, stable, complete) can be determined by sub-blocks of its matrix. In particular, an efficient approach for determining the basic extensions has been developed ...
متن کاملReasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks
This paper combines two recent extensions of Dung’s abstract argumentation frameworks in order to define an abstract formalism for reasoning about preferences in structured argumentation frameworks. First, extended argumentation frameworks extend Dung frameworks with attacks on attacks, thus providing an abstract dialectical semantics that accommodates argumentation-based reasoning about prefer...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1802.01526 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018